Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Redo-transplants: Is it More or Less the Same the Second Time Around?

Authors

  • Lauren McCreath Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Michael J Bonios Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Antigone Koliopoulou Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Omar Wever-Pinzon Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Spencer Wright Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Rami Alharethi Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Stephen H McKellar Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Greg Snow Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Bruce B Reid Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Katerina Skedros Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Anya Ragnhildstveit Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Jose Nativi Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Abdallah G Kfoury Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
  • Stavros G Drakos Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US

Keywords:

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy, heart transplant, coronary angiography, immunosuppression

Abstract

Purpose: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) continues to hinder the long-term success of heart transplant recipients.  Redo-transplantation is currently the only definitive treatment for advanced CAV. We examined whether these patients are at similar CAV-risk with the second transplant

Methods: Heart recipients from 1985 to 2011 at the UTAH program were included in the study and those with CAV as an indication for redo-transplantation were identified. CAV diagnosis was made by coronary angiography and based on the 2010 ISHLT standardized nomenclature for CAV. Patient demographics, rejection history, and CAV incidence were analyzed. 

Results: Of the 1,169 eligible patients, 135 (11.5%) developed CAV post their first transplant; 78 cases within 10 years and 54 beyond 10 years. The mean time to CAV was 6.58 years. Of the 135 patients who developed CAV, only 21 (15.5%) ended up requiring a redo-transplant. Of the 21 retransplanted patients, 4 (19.0%) developed CAV again; 2 patients within 10 years and 2 patients beyond 10 years indicating a similar risk for CAV occurrence for first and redo-transplant. 

Conclusions: Our results indicate that CAV is as likely to develop in redo-transplants despite recent advances in immunosuppression and the standardized use of lipid-lowering agents. Although outcomes in redo-transplantation for the indication of CAV are favorable, efforts to better understand and minimize CAV are needed, especially in the face of scarce donor organs.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-14

Issue

Section

Original Article